Re: my grammar gets me again.
Posted by johnross on .
You throw the fact around that Moroni took the plates to heaven- when in fact that name appears never in the Old or New Testament (only a few angels are named, and he's not one of em) and you use a piece of the book of Mormon... to prove the validity of the book of Mormon. Wouldn't it have been more convenient to leave the plates here so we all could see?
"o i c wat u did thar"
Our doctrine has never changed. Its only been added onto with the Pearls of Great Price and teh Doctrine & Covenants. As for those so called people who researched the golden plates. Where are the plates now? Aren't they in a museum? How come nobosy has any track record of this? Simple. As I stated once jospeh Smith was finished translating the plates, the angel Moroni took them back into heaven with him. But its nothing that you can really understand since you are basing all this based off of word of mouth and anti-mormon propaganda.
Replies:
| Book of Mormon original | dashagua -- 10/13/2005 12:11 pm UTC |
| Re: Book of Mormon original | Syntax -- 10/14/2005 5:21 am UTC |
| Re: my grammar gets me again. | HuBBsDoctor -- 10/13/2005 10:04 am UTC |
| Re: my grammar gets me again. | Syntax -- 10/14/2005 5:41 am UTC |
| Re: my grammar gets me again. | HuBBsDoctor -- 10/14/2005 10:38 am UTC |
| Re: my grammar gets me again. | johnross -- 10/13/2005 7:52 am UTC |
| Re: my grammar gets me again. | dashagua -- 10/13/2005 12:30 pm UTC |